http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/30/magazine/30Surrogate-t.html?_r=2&pagewanted=all
It sure looks to me like the photographer and/or editor of the piece took a bit of upper crust cluelessness and played a more than cruel joke on her; if you read the descriptions of the surrogate in the piece, the photos are the result of someone working really, really hard to make a point.
The overall effect is really kind of Gregory Crewdson. Yikes.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment